Monday , 19 March 2018
Home >> B >> Big Data >> The tellurian side of a information revolution

The tellurian side of a information revolution

For over a decade, information has been during or nearby a tip of a craving agenda. A strong ecosystem has emerged around all aspects of information (collection, management, storage, exploitation and disposition). And nonetheless in my discussions with Global 2000 executives, we find many are discontented with their information investments and capabilities. This is not a record problem. This is not a technique problem. This is a people problem. 

Those smitten of information mostly wish to discharge a tellurian from a equation, though it can’t be done. And so, as meridian scholarship considers a impact of male on a environment, information scholarship contingency combat with a inverse: a impact of information on man. 

You can fill a library with books articulate about a information revolution. There’s Viktor Mayer-Schönberger’s Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think; Steve Lohr’s Data-ism: Inside a Big Data Revolution; Malcolm Frank, Paul Roehrig and Ben Pring’s Code Halos; Bruce Schneier’s Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World; Christian Rudder’s Dataclysm: Who We Are (When We Think No One’s Looking); Andreas Weigend’s Data for a People: How to Make Our Post-Privacy Economy Work for You; and my really own The New Know: Innovation Powered by Analytics. 

These are excellent works of nonfiction focusing on a intensity and perils of a fast informating world. “Informating” is a tenure coined by Shoshana Zuboff in her book In a Age of a Smart Machine (1988). It is a routine that translates descriptions and measurements of activities, events and objects into data/information. “Datafication” is a synonym for “informating” — a trend compared with branch many aspects of complicated life into machine-readable information and transforming this information into new forms of value.  

==[ Click Here 1X ] [ Close ]==