Sunday , 23 July 2017
Home >> P >> Privacy >> Microsoft: We didn’t accept double a volume of US supervision information requests

Microsoft: We didn’t accept double a volume of US supervision information requests

Microsoft has backtracked on claims done in a latest clarity news that suggested that it had perceived some-more than double a series of notice requests from a US supervision in a initial half of 2016 than it perceived in a 6 months before.

The information in doubt is user calm that is demanded by a US supervision ‘for unfamiliar comprehension purposes’.

In a bi-annual clarity report, Microsoft had claimed that it had perceived between 1,000 and 1,499 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) requests from a US supervision between Jan 2016 and Jun 2016.

This was some-more than double a 0 to 499 FISA requests from a US supervision in a second half of 2015, and it was a top series of requests Microsoft had perceived in any half-year duration given 2011, when it began tracking supervision notice orders.

However, a Redmond-based program hulk has done a improvement to a US National Security Orders Report and concomitant blog post, that states that operation for a time duration was indeed 0 – 499 FISA orders. This means that a series of notice requests in a initial half of 2016 was a same or during slightest identical to that of a preceding six-month period.

Microsoft pronounced that all other information disclosed in a news was correct. The association pronounced it has put ‘additional safeguards in place’ to safeguard a numbers it reports are scold from now onwards, and apologised for a error.

The news had found that a series of users that a FISA orders associated to fell during a same duration – from between 17,500 and 17,999 in a final 6 months of 2015 to between 12,000 and 12,499 in a initial 6 months of 2016.

As good as releasing a clarity reports, Microsoft published a inhabitant confidence minute (NSL), a warrantless notice sequence used by a FBI, for a initial time.

In a letter, antiquated behind to 2014, a unnamed FBI workman asks for all subscriber information, singular to name, address, and length of service, for all services supposing to or accounts hold by a named subscriber.

The workman adds that a information sought “is applicable to an certified review to strengthen opposite general terrorism or surreptitious comprehension activities”.

Further reading

<!–

–>

  • <!–

  • Save this article

  • –>