Tuesday , 24 October 2017
Home >> H >> Hard Drives and Burners >> HP S700 Pro (1TB)

HP S700 Pro (1TB)

If you’re reading this and seeking yourself, “HP creates SSDs?” you’re not alone.

We suspicion a same thing on removing word of a company’s newest line of sober-looking solid-state drives. But HP has, indeed, flown underneath a radar in a rarely rival client-SSD market, charity branded drives for some time, built on other makers’ internals and competent in-house. Dubbed a S700 Pro, this new line comprises midrange SSDs built around 3D TLC NAND memory. As we’ve settled in new reviews of other 3D TLC-based drives, this kind of memory is all a fury these days in SSDs for consumers.

In fact, we’ve usually covered, in parallel, a launches of several new drives with this kind of memory inside. We tested a handful, among them a WD Blue 3D SSD, the SanDisk Ultra 3D, and the Intel SSD 545sSamsung SSD 850 EVO.

HP is charity both Pro and non-Pro versions of a S700 drive, with a Pro charity aloft opening ratings—as you’d expect. The singular angle with this drive, aside from a name approval conferred by a HP brand, is that HP states a new SSDs work hand-in-glove with a HP Setup Manager (HPdst.exe) module that comes pre-installed on HP computers. According to HP, this aids a well-spoken upgrade, wherein we mislay a spinning-platter expostulate from your HP laptop or desktop and slip one of these bad boys inside. Setup Manager acts as a front-end monitor for record transfers from your aged PC to a new one, as good as a backup-routine coordinator and a apparatus for handling concordant HP hardware, including HP printers.

We didn’t have a event to exam a S700 Pro in this context, yet if we are looking to ascent an HP-branded device, or your business is a mostly-HP shop, there might be some combined interest to this drive, contra like-priced competitors. Beyond that, though, this a neat yet unequivocally bare-bones package, a drive-in-a-box and zero more. Let’s see how it shakes out.

HP S700 Pro (End View)


Buying a Solid State Drive: 20 Terms You Need to Know.)

The HP S700 Pro is offered only in a informed 2.5-inch, 7mm-thick form factor, not as an M.2 “gumstick”-design drive. (See a beam The Best M.2 Solid-State Drives, Tested for some-more on those.) Nor is it being offering in a many faster PCI Express-bus variety. This expostulate uses a Serial ATA interface, and a upside, in a sense, is that many mechanism users who have PCs that need a expostulate ascent can use a SATA expostulate like this. This expostulate should be concordant with millions of PCs out in a wild. It’s entrance in where a volume is.

HP S700 Pro (Back)

The 1TB chronicle of a S700 Pro we tested is specified to run during speeds adult to 570MB per second for consecutive reads, and 525MB per second for consecutive writes. HP rates a smaller-capacity versions a tad slower, as we mostly see in any line of mainstream SSDs with wide-ranging capacities. (Usually, a reduce capacities get a somewhat obtuse ratings.)

HP S700 Pro (Box Contents 2)

As distant as on-drive facilities go, a usually one that HP flogs on a product page for this expostulate is blunder protection. This is, of course, invisible to a finish user, and it is unfit to quantify from a reviewer’s standpoint. HP also lists a choice to make use of External DRAM Cache in a information sheet, so there’s that, too, yet as we’ve seen before with Samsung SSDs and DRAM-employing schemes like Samsung’s Rapid Mode, they tend to increase benchmark numbers in many incomparable magnitude than they impact real-world performance.

When it comes to pricing, HP is being assertive right out of a embankment with a S700 Pros, with a following prices on Amazon during this writing…

   

  

This is pretty assertive pricing, a bit underneath 50 cents per gigabyte during all capacities and increasingly cheaper per gigabyte during a incomparable sizes. Now, it’s still not utterly as low as a reigning champ in a 3D TLC space, a Samsung SSD 850 EVO. Because that expostulate has been on a marketplace for some time, a cost has had a change to tumble further, and Samsung imposes economies of scale on a drives by production all a pieces itself, distinct competitors that need to source during slightest some of a components outside. The 500GB chronicle of a SSD 850 EVO, for example, goes for usually $175 these days, a good discount and a go-to collect during that cost level.

HP backs a S700 Pro with a three-year warranty, that is customary among midrange drives, yet reduction than a five-year guaranty Samsung offers on a EVO series. Beyond a drive, no accessories come in a box with a S700 Pro, detached from a guaranty prospectus and a parcel of ascent screws.



Performance Testing

Before we get started here: If you’re new to a universe of solid-state drives, a few things are value observant when it comes to performance.

For starters: If you’re upgrading from a customary spinning tough drive, any complicated SSD will be a outrageous improvement, speeding adult foot times and module launches. Most of today’s 2.5-inch SSDs make use of a specific interface, SATA 3.0 (also called “6Gbps SATA”), to grasp limit speed contra older, yet still extant, SATA 2 ports, that tip out during 300MB per second. We exam all a SATA SSDs on a SATA 3.0-equipped test-bed PC to uncover their full opening abilities. To get a many speed probable from complicated drives, you’ll need a complement with SATA 3.0 capability, as well.

If your complement is formed on roughly any new Intel chipset (or one of a newer AMD chipsets), it has this interface. Be certain before buying, though. If your complement is well-aged and doesn’t have SATA 3.0 support, there’s little prove in profitable a reward for a expostulate with a limit probable performance. SATA 3.0-capable drives work excellent with previous-generation SATA ports, usually during a comparison interface’s speed, so there’s meagre reason to compensate additional for expostulate speed that your complement can’t take advantage of. Any simple stream SSD will work usually as well, in that SATA 3.0-less scenario.


AS-SSD (Sequential Read Write Speeds)

As a name suggests, a AS-SSD benchmark utility is designed to exam SSDs, as against to normal spinning tough drives. The consecutive tests magnitude a drive’s ability to review and write vast files. Drive makers mostly quote these speeds, as a fanciful maximum, on a wrapping or in advertising.

Sequential speeds are critical if you’re operative with unequivocally vast files for picture or video editing, or we play lots of games with vast levels that take a prolonged time to bucket with normal tough drives. We secure-erase all SSDs before using this test.

WD Blue 3D SSD (M.2, 1TB) (AS-SSD Sequential Reads)

Well, well, well. We didn’t pattern this, yet a HP S700 Pro shot right atop a benchmark draft on this initial test, despite by usually a few whiskers. Granted, it was within a domain of blunder of all of a drives in a tip half of this chart. But that’s still considerable for a mint SSD. Perhaps HP’s engineers have dabbed on a tip salsa to a drive’s firmware that allows it to outperform a competition?

WD Blue 3D SSD (M.2, 1TB) (AS-SSD Sequential Writes)

…aaaand a celebration is over. In a sequential-write apportionment of this test, a S700 Pro fell behind to earth, proof once again that when it comes to SSDs, it’s many easier to review things quick than to write them. This is fundamental formed on an SSD’s design, given it has to erase what’s in a retard before it can write to it, distinct a tough drive. Its measure of 465MB per second is reduce than normal for this rival set, yet it’s still decent for a complicated SSD. For what it’s worth, it outpaced WD’s new Blue 3D SSD, that uses a identical accumulation of memory. (Still, it’s not a outrageous disproportion overall, usually about 20MB per second.)


AS-SSD (4K Read Write Speeds)

This test, also a partial of a SSD-centric AS-SSD benchmark, measures a drive’s ability to trade little files. Often overlooked, 4K performance, utterly 4K write performance, is critical when it comes to foot speed and module launch times.

When booting adult and rising programs, many little files get accessed and edited frequently. The faster your expostulate can write and review these kinds of files (especially energetic couple library, or DLL, files in Windows), a faster your OS will “feel.” Since little files like these get accessed many some-more frequently than vast media or game-level files, a drive’s opening on this exam will have a incomparable impact on how quick a expostulate feels in bland use.

WD Blue 3D SSD (M.2, 1TB) (AS-SSD 4K Reads)

When it comes to little reads, a HP S700 Pro landed in a reduce plot of a leaderboard, yet it’s also right subsequent to a Samsung SSD 850 Pro, differently one of a tip SATA SSDs we have tested to date. It was means to review these little files during a rate of 27.4MB per second, that is utterly a bit behind some of foe here. The WD Blue 3D, for example, was means to strike 40.8MB per second, so there’s a bit of a opening delta here.

As for writes…

WD Blue 3D SSD (M.2, 1TB) (AS-SSD 4K Writes)

The formula from this exam prove many complicated SSDs are utterly tighten on this charge type, with a S700 Pro alighting mid-pack. Its opening was homogeneous to what we saw from other 3D TLC drives, so no surprises here.


Anvil’s Storage Utilities

Like AS-SSD, Anvil is an SSD-specific set of drive-benchmarking tests. We’ll news here a Overall Score, that is subsequent from Anvil’s Read and Write scores with a application using during default settings (that is, with 100 percent incompressible data). Again, a expostulate was secure-erased before a exam was run.

WD Blue 3D SSD (M.2, 1TB) (Anvil)

Not too surprisingly, a S700 Pro scored about normal in this test, in a lower-middle of a swarming domain and outpaced by a WD/SanDisk/Intel 3D TLC SSDs. Interestingly, though, it outpaced a older Toshiba OCZ VX500, that was once a high-end SATA SSD. Overall, this outcome usually reinforces a ubiquitous believe about SATA SSDs these days: that many perform comparatively similarly. A lean of 200 points adult or down on this exam is not all that significant.


Crystal DiskMark (QD32 Testing)

Crystal DiskMark uses incompressible information for testing, that stresses many complicated SSDs utterly a bit given they rest on information application to grasp their limit turn of performance. This sold subtest is designed to replicate a duties of an SSD located inside a Web server, as it’s asked to perform a smattering of little reads, 4K in size. While it’s reading these files, a reserve of 32 superb requests is lined adult (a “queue depth” 32 requests deep). That’s customary of a high-volume Web server, that has to perform requests entrance in during a same time from several clients.

WD Blue 3D SSD (M.2, 1TB) (Crystal 4K QD32 Reads)

WD Blue 3D SSD (M.2, 1TB) (Crystal 4K QD32 Writes)

Over time, we’ve seen a few tiers emerge from a formula of this exam with a SATA drives, and a S700 Pro placed in a second-to-last tier for both reads and writes. To be satisfactory to HP, this exam is grueling, and not demonstrative of a bucket that a consumer/client expostulate would typically face. But we like to run it regardless as a unequivocally worst-case scenario. That said, copiousness of other drives did improved here, yet nothing of this lot is designed for 24/7 server duties.


PCMark 7 Secondary Storage Test

Our final exam is a PCMark 7 Secondary Storage Test. This holistic hearing simulates bland expostulate accesses in a Windows environment.

WD Blue 3D SSD (M.2, 1TB) (PCMark 7)

This exam underscores a SATA-SSD truth, again: That in a genuine world, all of these drives feel likewise fast. The tip three-quarters of these drives in a draft above were all within a domain of blunder of one another, and a S700 Pro was pound in a center of this batch. A lean of +/-150 points, or thereabouts, is not poignant here, definition that many of these drives are within distinguished stretch of any other.



Conclusion

The HP S700 Pro showed no diseased areas on a testing, yet a opening was run-of-the-mill as SATA drives go. As an ascent for shoppers with an HP-brand laptop or desktop, we can see some interest here, yet we consider HP will have to get even some-more assertive on a pricing to get distant over that. We can’t unequivocally see a customary home or business upgrader opting for one of these over, say, a Samsung SSD 850 EVO but a transparent assets incentive, unless they’re an all-HP emporium and wish to occupy a Setup software.

HP S700 Pro (Box)

Now, that is not indispensably a problem; a plain SSD is a plain SSD. At worst, a S700 Pro simply throws HP’s shawl in a ring, giving an HP-branded choice to buyers or IT folks who have code faithfulness or fleets of HP systems to maintain. The expostulate otherwise, though, doesn’t offer many over what is now accessible from a rest of a TLC-NAND lot. So it’s not unequivocally relocating a marketplace forward, usually adding another competitively labelled choice with name-brand recognition.

That’s compelling…if a cost is right. And in a SATA market, cost breakthroughs are about as many as we can wish for. We don’t pattern to see new SSDs strike new levels in SATA-drive performance, given a stipulations of a interface. We see this SSD like we do many business IT products: designed to be organic and long-lasting instead of flashy.

According to a many simple SSD metrics, this is a successful entrance expostulate in this new line. But if you’re not an HP-loyal customer, we wish to see some-more price-drop action. Otherwise, we should also be looking during more-attractive, accessory-laden options.

TERMS OF USE

ComputerShopper might acquire associate commissions from selling links enclosed on this page. To find out more, review a finish Terms of Service.

close
==[ Click Here 1X ] [ Close ]==