A former NHS director who had been operative in a GP medicine has been fined for unlawfully accessing studious records.
Sally Anne Day, who comes from Abergavenny in Wales, pleaded guilty to dual offences underneath territory 55 of a Data Protection Act when appearing for sentencing during Newport Crown Court.
Day had unlawfully accessed a medical annals of dual patients between Aug 2015 and Jul 2016, causing a patients distress, a Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) said.
In that period, she had accessed a initial patient’s annals a towering 51 times, and a second patient’s annals on a serve 8 occasions.
The box had been brought to a ICO and was creatively listed during Cwmbran Magistrates Court though was eliminated to a climax court, due to a critical crack of trust concerned and a series of times patients’ annals were accessed illegally.
Day subsequently quiescent from her pursuit as an director for Powys Trust Health Board (PTHB) where she worked in a GP surgery, and was fined £790 in total; £200 for any offence, as good as £350 in costs and a £40 plant surcharge.
ICO coercion organisation manager Michael Shaw pronounced this was another box of someone removing in critical difficulty by ignorning studious confidentiality and their information insurance responsibilities.
“Those who work with supportive personal information need to be wakeful that if they entrance that information but good reason, they could good find themselves in justice and finish adult with a rapist conviction,” he said.
Last year a ICO fined a GP use £40,000 for divulgence trusted sum about a lady and her family to her disloyal ex-partner. Regal Chambers, of Hitchin, Hertfordshire, gave out a information notwithstanding a lady warning staff that they should take sold caring to strengthen her details.
When her ex-partner done a ask for a medical annals of a former couple’s son, staff gave him 62 pages value of information that enclosed a woman’s hit details, her relatives sum and a sum of an comparison child a male was not associated to. This was put down to a GP use carrying deficient systems in place to safeguard unapproved personal information was not common with those who weren not entitled to see it – a crack of a Data Protection Act.
Save this article