Monday , 22 January 2018
Home >> H >> Hard Drives and Burners >> Corsair Force MP500 (480GB)

Corsair Force MP500 (480GB)

Corsair, maybe improved famous for a energy supplies, PC cases, and gaming rigging than a storage hardware, threw itself into a now-crowded pool of flagship PCI Express solid-state drives (SSDs) with a Force MP500 expostulate progressing this year. This little speed demon has all a latest SSD record that’s now available, congested into a little 22mm by 80mm footprint. Indeed, it’s been built to take on all a fastest consumer-grade SSDs now on a market. And when we contend it has all a latest technology, we meant it.

Not customarily is it rocking a “stick of gum” M.2 form factor, nonetheless it connects to a PCI Express interface, and uses 4 lanes (which is a stream maximum). Like other leading-edge drives, it creates use of a comparatively new NVMe custom in unison with that interface, instead of a old-fashioned AHCI custom used by required Serial ATA-based SSD and tough drives.

These facilities concede it to run during speeds that good outpace any of a SATA drives on a market, and that’s a whole point. Over a past year or so, an wholly new stand of PCI Express drives have launched that leave a aged SATA drives in a dust, and a Corsair MP500 is one of a newer ones to enter a fray.

Corsair Force MP500 M.2 NVMe SSD (Box and Drive)

Corsair has a work cut out for it, as it’s going adult opposite some strong excellent SSDs. Its biggest foe is naturally Samsung’s latest-gen opening SSDs, a SSD 960 Pro and SSD 960 EVO, that are also PCI Express x4 and NVMe drives. It’s also confronting some foe from Plextor’s newest M.2 SSD, a Plextor M8Pe, as good as a Toshiba OCZ RD400.

All of these drives are blazing quick and as good as it gets in a consumer-SSD world, with a customarily downside being they are a bit pricier than SATA-based SSDs. Like in all things carrying to do with performance-minded PC parts, we gotta compensate if we wanna play, as it’s pronounced on a streets. Luckily, as some-more of these forms of drives enter a market, we’ll eventually see prices start to decrease, because…well, capitalism.

Corsair is like many makers of SSDs, in that it doesn’t fashion a possess silicon; it has to fist all a components indispensable from other companies, afterwards mix them to emanate drives like a Force MP500. This is a box with many SSD manufacturers, nonetheless not a truly outrageous ones like Samsung, Intel, and Crucial/Micron, that have entrance to their possess fabs (or special arrangements) and can make all or many of a tools themselves. For a Force MP500, Corsair has baked adult a recipe that uses Toshiba 15nm MLC NAND peep in and with an eight-channel controller from Phison.

The multiple of a dual allows a Force MP500 to offer sequential-read speeds, according to Corsair, of adult to 3GB per second and sequential-write speeds adult to 2.4GB per second. Yes, that’s gigabyte, not gigabit; these drives are smokin’ fast, indeed. As a reminder, SATA drives tip out during about 500MB per second, and that’s megabytes, so drives like a MP500 paint a fanciful five-fold boost in examination speeds, and a four-fold one in write speeds. Those speeds won’t indispensably interpret into real-world gains we can feel by a cause of 4x or 5x, nonetheless they do demeanour good in benchmarks.

Corsair Force MP500 M.2 NVMe SSD (Drive Front Sticker)

Corsair offers a Force MP500 in 3 capacities: 120GB, 240GB, and 480GB. The rated opening does flog adult a bit as a ability increases, nonetheless it unequivocally depends on what apparatus you’re regulating to magnitude it. The rated continuation also increases with a capacity, as a 120GB expostulate can hoop a whopping 175 terabytes created (TBW), per Corsair, with a 240GB and 480GB models rated to withstand 349TBW and 640TBW, respectively. If we need some context on these numbers: They are all utterly large, as a customary energy user, Corsair estimates, competence write 15TB to a expostulate in one year. So all 3 of these expostulate capacities offer some-more than adequate continuation to final good over their three-year warranty.

The expostulate is complemented by Corsair’s downloadable SSD-software utility, that is dubbed Corsair SSD Toolbox. It allows for a usual-suspect routines, permitting we to secure-erase a drive, refurbish a firmware, and see a drive’s health. Most people rarely, if ever, indeed need to use these features, nonetheless it’s useful that Corsair has lonesome a basis with a module utility. We’ve lonesome SSD Toolbox previously, and we can see screenshots and more in a examination of a company’s Neutron XTi SSD. That said, some of a facilities were not nonetheless activated for this NVMe drive, and presumably were there in a module as vestiges of how a module works with SATA drives. We couldn’t do a secure-erase by SSD Toolbox during this writing, for example.

When we wrote this in Apr 2017, a Force MP500 was using on Amazon for a following prices: 120GB for a $110 model, 240GB for $170, and a 480GB we tested for $259. These prices are opposition for a marketplace they are in, and they should give a Samsung SSD 960 EVO a run for a money, presumption opening is in line with a spec sheet. Let’s puncture into that.


If you’re new to a universe of solid-state drives, a few things are value observant when it comes to performance.

For starters: If you’re upgrading from a customary spinning tough drive, any complicated SSD will be a outrageous improvement, speeding adult foot times and creation programs launch some-more quickly. Most of today’s SSDs make use of a SATA 3.0 interface (also called “6Gbps SATA”), and they can be implemented as laptop-style 2.5-inch drives (in a same figure as tough drives), or as M.2 gumsticks like this one.

The expostulate we’re looking here, though, is an M.2 drive, and not one that uses a SATA interface. (Note that some M.2-form-factor drives do run over a SATA bus.) This one creates use of both a PCI Express train (employing 4 PCI Express lanes, customarily dubbed “x4”) and a new NVMe protocol.

Corsair Force MP500 M.2 NVMe SSD (Drive Back)

Support for both is key. At this point, it’s mostly high-end laptops and convertibles, such as the Microsoft Surface Pro 4Dell XPS 13Ryzen 7 1700X. Note, though, that some motherboards might support PCI Express drives, nonetheless customarily during PCI Express x2 speeds, and some might support PCI Express x4 speeds, nonetheless not NVMe.

In other words, be really certain what your complement or house supports before buying, given no one wants to buy a super-fast expostulate customarily to find out it won’t run—or won’t run during a fastest probable speeds—in your existent system. Over a subsequent few years, we design support for these facilities to turn many some-more common, nonetheless during a impulse selling a best M.2 expostulate that your complement can hoop is still a bit of a minefield. For a consummate explainer, see a beam The Best M.2 Solid-State Drives, Tested.

Before we get to a opening comparisons, it’s value indicating out that we’ll be pitting a Force MP500 opposite a slew of identical and not-so-similar drives. Of course, we enclosed a other PCI Express/NVMe drives we’ve tested to date: the Samsung SSD 960 EVOSSD 960 ProIntel 750 SeriesToshiba OCZ RD400Crucial MX300. The slower SATA-based drives don’t have a wish of competing with a Force MP500 or other NVMe drives on many of a tests. They are there to yield context around a opening differences between those some-more common drives and a many faster PCI Express/NVMe-based options.

PCMark 8 Storage Test

The Storage Test is a subtest underneath Futuremark’s incomparable PCMark 8 benchmarking suite. It employs a opposite proceed to expostulate contrast than pristine speed tests like AS-SSD, that we’ll get to below. PCMark 8 runs a array of scripted tasks (dubbed “traces”) that copy bland PC operation underneath programs like Adobe Creative Suite, Microsoft Office, and renouned games. The outcome is a disdainful numeric score; a aloft a number, a better. This measure is useful in gauging ubiquitous opening contra other drives. 

TeamGroup T-Force Cardea (PCMark 8)

We haven’t tested all of a drives we’ve reviewed on PCMark 8, so this is usually a taster. The Corsair Force MP500 is precisely in a hunt, as it’s tighten to a same measure as a renouned Samsung SSD 960 EVO drive, that is what many drives in this category are aiming for; it’s deliberate to offer a many appetizing mix of cost and performance. Another engaging tidbit is that a Intel 750 Series expostulate is right alongside a M.2 NVMe lot, that is considerable for a others given a Intel 750 used to be a fastest consumer-feasible SSD on a planet. Newer drives have muscled in on a disdainful status, nonetheless it’s positively no slouch.

AS-SSD (Sequential Read Write Speeds)

This exam uses a AS-SSD benchmark utility, that is designed to exam SSDs (as against to normal tough drives). It measures a drive’s ability to examination and write vast files. Drive makers mostly quote these speeds, as a fanciful maximum, on a wrapping or in advertising.

Sequential speeds are critical if you’re operative with really vast files for picture or video editing, or we play lots of games with vast levels that take a prolonged time to bucket with normal tough drives. Again, we secure-erase all SSDs before using this test.

TeamGroup T-Force Cardea (AS-SSD Seq Reads)

Here, we see a Corsair Force MP500 alighting solidly in a second tier of M.2 NVMe SSDs we’ve tested (which ends, above, with a ADATA drive). It’s not utterly as quick as a Samsung and Intel drives, nonetheless neck-and-neck with somewhat comparison PCI Express NVME drives like a Samsung SSD 950 Pro, Toshiba OCZ RD400, and Plextor M8Pe. This puts a Corsair expostulate in sincerely plain company, nonetheless it’s decidedly mid-pack.

TeamGroup T-Force Cardea (AS-SSD Seq Writes)

The formula of a sequential-write exam mostly counterpart those of a examination test, that shows Samsung silicon approach out in front and a rest of a PCI Express drives battling for third place. The Corsair Force MP500 achieved pretty well, roughly restraining with a comparison Toshiba OCZ RD400 expostulate during 1.2GB-per-second write speeds. That’s a distant cry from a advertised speeds of 2.4GB per second, nonetheless AS-SSD never shows a drives in their best light, given it uses information sets that are not compressible, that is because we run it.

We also news AS-SSD’s Overall Score, that is subsequent from these AS-SSD tests and several others…

TeamGroup T-Force Cardea (AS-SSD Overall)

In box there was any doubt where a Force MP500 lands in a SSD hierarchy, a AS-SSD Overall Score re-iterates a mid-pack status. In this test, it’s clearly not as quick as a newer Samsung SSD 960 drives (or Intel’s 750 Series), nonetheless it is really one of a faster drives in a second step on a podium. In fact, it scored roughly a accurate same as a Samsung SSD 950 Pro expostulate overall, that isn’t too unfair nonetheless during a same time, is scholastic of Samsung’s widespread place in a SSD firmament: Corsair’s expostulate is comparatively new, while a SSD 950 Pro came out in late 2015.

Crystal DiskMark (QD32 Testing)

Crystal DiskMark also uses incompressible information for testing, that stresses many complicated SSDs utterly a bit given they rest on information application to grasp their limit turn of performance. This sold exam is designed to replicate a duties of an SSD located inside a Web server, as it’s asked to perform a smattering of little reads, that are 4K in size. While it’s reading these files, a reserve of 32 superb requests is lined up. That’s customary of a high-volume Web server, that has to perform requests that all come in during a same time from several clients.

TeamGroup T-Force Cardea (Crystal 4K 32 Reads)

In this test, a Corsair Force MP500 was fundamentally tied with a Toshiba OCZ RD400 drive, attack 604MB per second in what is a maybe too-grueling benchmark. The faster SSDs were means to broach speeds in a top 600MB range, so a MP500 isn’t too distant behind, nonetheless again, it’s in a center tier of drives of a kind as against to a top echelon.

TeamGroup T-Force Cardea (Crystal 4K Writes QD32)

The Force MP500 achieved good in this test, as many of a drives were means to plate out around 600MB per sec, and a Corsair expostulate strike 591MB. Interestingly, many of a PCIe/NVMe drives achieved really likewise on this test, a Samsung SSD 950 Pro aside, so it looks like for these drives during reserve abyss 32, there’s not many some-more to fist out of them. To Corsair’s credit, a Force MP500 was a plain step faster than a rival, a Toshiba OCZ RD400.

AS-SSD (4K Read Write Speeds)

This test, also a partial of a SSD-centric AS-SSD benchmark, measures a drive’s ability to trade little files. Often overlooked, 4K performance, quite 4K write performance, is critical when it comes to foot speed and module launch times.

When booting adult and rising programs, many little files get accessed and edited frequently. The faster your expostulate can write and examination these (especially energetic couple library, or DLL, files in Windows), a faster your OS will “feel.” Since little files like these get accessed many some-more mostly than vast media or game-level files, a drive’s opening on this exam will have a larger impact on how quick a expostulate feels in bland use.

TeamGroup T-Force Cardea (AS-SSD 4K Reads)

The Force MP500 had a best display nonetheless in this test, that bodes good for a use in desktop PCs that examination little files from a OS all day long. It was a fastest expostulate among determined brands, with customarily a Team Group T-Force Cardea expostulate eclipsing it. Interestingly, in this exam we see that PCIe drives have meagre advantage over SATA drives, as a many comparison Samsung SSD 850 EVO was usually 1MB per sec slower than a Corsair drive, while violence a many higher-spec’d siblings. Still, a Corsair expostulate achieved intensely good in this test.

TeamGroup T-Force Cardea (AS-SSD 4K Writes)

Though a Corsair expostulate was means to run adult front in a examination apportionment of this test, it was a backbencher in a write portion, and finished in a area of a mid-level PCIe SSDs from prior years. This is identical to a progressing results, so it does seem to be a solidly mid-level SSD in comparison to a PCIe-based rivals.


Corsair is famous for delivering high-quality products, and a Force MP500 falls into that class. But competing in a SSD space is a lot harder than in keyboards or energy supplies.

The Force MP500 so is a plain PCIe SSD that won’t disappoint, nonetheless it’s a bit of a head-scratcher when comparing it to a pack. It’s not wholly opposition with a latest PCIe SSDs from Samsung, and a drives that it does contest with all came out during slightest a year ago. It’s fast, nonetheless a PCI Express SSD marketplace is red prohibited right now in terms of competition, and whenever a new expostulate arrives a doubt becomes, “Is it faster than a Samsung SSD 960 EVO?” In a Corsair Force MP500’s case, that’s a “no,” that afterwards leads to a subsequent question, “Well, then, is it at least reduction expensive?”

Corsair MP500

That’s also a “no,” as a drives are labelled roughly a same. And that leads into a hardest doubt of all: “Why would we select this expostulate over a Samsung?” The answer to that question: You substantially should buy a Samsung SSD 960 EVO, unless a cost has forsaken a fraction, or you’re a Corsair code loyalist.

Maybe we have a Corsair box and CPU cooler, and like a company’s products. If that’s a case, we will adore a Force MP500. And indeed, in real-world, day-to-day use, all NVMe SSDs we’ve used feel likewise speedy. It’s customarily when we get into postulated writes or reads that a pointed differences emerge. But for everybody else that usually wants a best SSD for a money, that pretension still goes to a Samsung SSD 960 EVO. Corsair’s Force MP500 is a really workable PCIe/NVMe SSD, nonetheless it needs some nitro, or a cost drop, to make it a some-more constrained buy.


ComputerShopper might acquire associate commissions from selling links enclosed on this page. To find out more, examination a finish Terms of Service.

==[ Click Here 1X ] [ Close ]==