Monday , 11 December 2017
Home >> E >> Enterprise >> ​No, a Linux desktop hasn’t jumped in popularity

​No, a Linux desktop hasn’t jumped in popularity


MillerCoors sues HCL Tech for $100 million over disaster to exercise ERP project


MillerCoors sues HCL Tech for $100 million over disaster to exercise ERP project

It is still misleading as to since a plan went awry, as is a box with many formidable ERP implementations.

Read More

There have been countless stories that a Linux desktop has some-more than doubled from a common 1.5 to 3 percent marketshare to 5 percent. These reports have been formed on NetMarketShare‘s desktop handling complement analysis, that showed Linux leaping from 2.5 percent in July, to roughly 5 percent in September. But unfortunately for Linux fans, it’s not true.

Neither does it seem to be Google’s Chrome OS, that tends to be under-represented in NetMarketShare and StatCounter desktop handling complement numbers, being counted as Linux. Mind you, that would be fair, given Chrome OS is formed on Linux.

The genuine reason is distant some-more mundane. It seems to be merely a mistake. Vince Vizzaccaro, NetMarketShare’s executive selling share of selling told me, “The Linux share being reported is not correct. We are wakeful of a emanate and are now looking into it.”

If that sounds peculiar to you, that’s since we substantially consider that NetMarketShare and StatCounter simply count user numbers. They don’t. Instead, any uses a possess tip salsa to come adult with handling complement numbers.

NetMarketShare’s methodology is to “collect information from a browsers of site visitors to a disdainful on-demand network of HitsLink Analytics and SharePost clients. The network includes over 40,000 websites, and spans a globe. We ‘count’ singular visitors to a network sites, and usually count one singular revisit to any network site per day.”

The association afterwards weights a information by country. “We review a trade to a CIA Internet Traffic by Country table, and weight a information accordingly. For example, if a tellurian information shows that Brazil represents 2% of a traffic, and a CIA list shows Brazil to paint 4% of tellurian Internet traffic, we will count any singular caller from Brazil twice.”

How accurately do they “weigh” that singular revisit per day to a site data? We don’t know.

StatCounter also has a possess method. It uses a “tracking formula commissioned on some-more than 2 million sites globally. These sites cover several activities and geographic locations. Every month, we record billions of page views to these sites. For any page view, we analyse a browser/operating system/screen fortitude used and we settle if a page perspective is from a mobile device. … We promulgate all this information to get a Global Stats information.

We yield independent, unprejudiced stats on internet use trends. We do not collect a stats with any other information sources. No synthetic weightings are used.”

How do they promulgate their data? Guess what? We don’t know that either.

So whenever we see handling complement or browser numbers from possibly of these often-quoted services, take them with a really vast pellet of salt.

For a many accurate, despite US-centric handling complement and browser numbers, we cite to use information from a sovereign government’s Digital Analytics Program (DAP).

Unlike a others, DAP’s numbers come from billions of visits over a past 90 days to over 400 US executive bend supervision domains. That’s about 5,000 sum websites, and includes each cupboard department. DAP gets a tender information from a Google Analytics account. DAP has open-sourced a code, that displays a information on a web and a data-collection code. Best of all, distinct a others, we can download a information in JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) format so we can investigate a tender numbers yourself.

In a US Analytics site, that summarizes DAP’s data, we will find desktop Linux, as usual, unresolved out in “other” during 1.5 percent. Windows, as always, is on tip with 45.9 percent, followed by Apple iOS, during 25.5 percent, Android during 18.6 percent, and macOS during 8.5 percent.

Sorry folks, we wish it were aloft too. Indeed, we am certain it is. No one, not even DAP, seems to do a good pursuit of pulling out a Linux-based Chrome OS data. Still, a Linux desktop stays a safety for Linux experts, program developers, complement administrators, and engineers. Linux fans contingency sojourn calm with a tip dog handling complement in all other computing inclination — servers, clouds, supercomputers, etc.

PREVIOUS AND RELATED COVERAGE

close
==[ Click Here 1X ] [ Close ]==